MP to campaign for domestic abuse victims after rape ruling against ex…

MP to campaign for domestic abuse victims after rape ruling against ex…




A Conservative MP found to have been raped by her politician ex-husband says she will campaign for victims of domestic violence.

ate Griffiths, MP for Burton in Staffordshire, waived her legal right to anonymity in a bid to help journalists show a family court estimate’s findings about Andrew Griffiths at a private hearing.

Mr Griffiths, 51, had argued that estimate Elizabeth Williscroft’s findings should not be made public but lost fights in the High Court and the Court of allurement.

Close

Andrew Griffiths (Aaron Chown/PA)

PA

Andrew Griffiths (Aaron Chown/PA)

Three allurement judges ruled on Friday that estimate Williscroft’s findings could be made public after a 12-month legal fight by two media organisations, and Ms Griffiths, 51, said now she wanted to help other victims.

“I welcome this decision as a positive step forward in a legal battle that has taken a huge emotional and financial toll on my family,” she said.

“I supported publication of the Family Court’s findings – and waived my right to anonymity — because I recognise the rare position I am in to campaign to enhance the outcomes of situations such as this, for those who persevere domestic violence, and the actions taken to protect the children involved.

“When I stood for election as member of Parliament for Burton and Uttoxeter, I promised I would be a voice for those who have been victims of domestic abuse.

“I am committed to working with colleagues across Parliament to enhance both the sustain obtainable to — and the outcomes for — those who have been by similar experiences to me.”

Barrister Charlotte Proudman, who represents Ms Griffiths, posted a tweet describing the MP as “amazing”.

The BIGGEST case of the year I represented amazing Kate Griffiths MP. Her ex-husband Andrew Griffiths (disgraced former MP) raped her in her sleep, abused her & coercively controlled her. We fought to have their names published. No more silencing ✊ https://t.co/icxHYN9hYD

— Dr Charlotte Proudman (@DrProudman) December 10, 2021

estimate Williscroft is overseeing a argument between Mr and Ms Griffiths centred on a child.

In November 2020, the estimate had considered Ms Griffiths’ allegations about the way Mr Griffiths had treated her.

Mr Griffiths denied her allegations and “adamantly denied” rape.

But estimate Williscroft found on the balance of probabilities that Mr Griffiths had raped Ms Griffiths, pressured her into sexual activity, and used “coercive and controlling behaviour”.

Mr Griffiths used to be the MP for Burton and the minister for small business, and once worked as Theresa May’s chief of staff. He resigned in July 2018 after a Sunday newspaper reported that he had sent “depraved” messages to two constituents.

He was reported to have bombarded a 28-year-old barmaid and her friend with lewd comments over social media during a three-week period.

estimate Williscroft made findings in favour of Ms Griffiths but decided that those findings should not be made public, to protect the child at the centre of the case.

Two journalists – freelance Louise Tickle, who works for Tortoise Media, and a PA news agency reporter – learned about estimate Williscroft’s findings.

They argued that the public had a right to know and launched a legal fight.

Mr Griffiths said the estimate’s findings should stay private, to protect the child at the centre of the case.

High Court estimate Mrs Justice Lieven ruled that estimate Williscroft’s findings should be revealed, and Mr and Ms Griffiths named.

allurement judges have now dismissed a challenge to that ruling by Ms Griffiths.

“This battle has taken over a year, and has cost Tortoise tens of thousands of pounds,” said Tortoise Media editor Basia Cummings.

“We joined with PA Media to argue that the details of this case should be published, putting collaboration ahead of competition to fight to report in the public interest.

“If we had not, the privacy of the family courts would have allowed a former politician to hide his abuse, and would have denied his wife any chance to speak about it.

“Without transparency, there is no accountability, and we welcome today’s judgment by the Court of allurement.”

Click: See details




leave your comment

Search

Top